WARISHA D/O SHRI TAHIR KHAN, vs STATE OF RAJATHAN — CRLW/1108/2025

Case under The Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Oct-2025

CNR: RJHC020704242025

e-Filing Number

12-08-2025

Filing Number

CRLW/30220/2025

Filing Date

13-Aug-2025

Registration No

CRLW/1108/2025

Registration Date

13-Aug-2025

Judge

Uma Shanker Vyas

Coram

Uma Shanker Vyas

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Other Criminal matters ( 113 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WARISHA D/O SHRI TAHIR KHAN,

    Adv. SANJAY KHAN

  2. 2.VAHID KHAN S/O SHRI JUMME KHAN,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJATHAN

  2. 2.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

  3. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

  4. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION, VAISHALI NAGAR,

  5. 5.AAS MOHAMMED S/O AAS MOHAMMED,

  6. 6.TAHIR KHAN S/O AAS MOHAMMED,

  7. 7.AMEEN KHAN S/O ABDUL,

  8. 8.SULTAN S/O NURUDDIN

  9. 9.JILSAN S/O SULTAN

  10. 10.SATTAR S/O NURUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Uma Shanker VyasView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a writ petition by two petitioners seeking protection of life and personal liberty, finding that petitioner No. 1 was already married. The court held that a live-in relationship between a married and unmarried person is not legally permissible under Indian law, relying on the Supreme Court's D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal precedent which requires both parties to be unmarried and qualified to marry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Admission- Notice Not Issued

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    Bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF

  6. 03-Oct-2025

    Shubha MehtaView PDF

  7. 20-Aug-2025

    Shubha MehtaView PDF

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLW/1108/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a writ petition by two petitioners seeking protection of life and personal liberty, finding that petitioner No. 1 was already married. The court held that a live-in relationship between a married and unmarried person is not legally permissible under Indian law, relying on the Supreme Court's D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal precedent which requires both parties to be unmarried and qualified to marry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case