RAJNI W/O OKESH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/9385/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: RJHC020572122026
e-Filing Number
15-06-2026
Filing Number
CRLMB/24095/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRLMB/9385/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Ravi Chirania (V.j.)
Coram
Ravi Chirania (V.j.)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJNI W/O OKESH
Adv. VIKAS JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Ravi Chirania (V.j.)View PDF
CRLMB 9385/2026 - Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Rajni W/o Okesh, a Village Development Officer arrested under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for alleged corruption. The Court allowed the second bail application, noting that the charge-sheet had been filed, the petitioner had been incarcerated for a considerable period, and trial would take significant time. She was released on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to appearing before the trial court and refraining from misusing the liberty granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMB/9385/2026
CRLMB 9385/2026 - Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Rajni W/o Okesh, a Village Development Officer arrested under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for alleged corruption. The Court allowed the second bail application, noting that the charge-sheet had been filed, the petitioner had been incarcerated for a considerable period, and trial would take significant time. She was released on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, subject to appearing before the trial court and refraining from misusing the liberty granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts