LALARAM S/O SHRI DURGA LAL JI MEENA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — HC/196/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: RJHC020555702026

e-Filing Number

06-06-2026

Filing Number

HC/32144/2026

Filing Date

06-Jun-2026

Registration No

HC/196/2026

Registration Date

06-Jun-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Other Habeas Corpus Cases ( 304 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALARAM S/O SHRI DURGA LAL JI MEENA

    Adv. ANANT SHARMA, ,VIKASH MEENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  3. 3.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  6. 6.THE SHO (Station House Officer)

  7. 7.PANKAJ MEENA S/O SANTOSH MEENA

  8. 8.SANTOSH MEENA S/O UNKNOWN

  9. 9.VEDU MEENA S/O RAJU MEENA

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Uma Shanker Vyas (V. J.),ashok Kumar Jain (V. J.)View PDF

    Case Summary: HC/196/2026 Petitioner Lalaram complained that police were not investigating his 19-year-old daughter's elopement despite repeated requests. The court directed the Public Prosecutor to ensure the Station House Officer registers an FIR within 24 hours and personally investigates the matter, with updates provided to the petitioner. The case was adjourned for one week to verify compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. HC/196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HC/196/2026 Petitioner Lalaram complained that police were not investigating his 19-year-old daughter's elopement despite repeated requests. The court directed the Public Prosecutor to ensure the Station House Officer registers an FIR within 24 hours and personally investigates the matter, with updates provided to the petitioner. The case was adjourned for one week to verify compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case