DR. BRIJ BALLABH SHARMA S/O SHRI SUA LAL SHARMA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - ARCHIT BOHRA — CW/9720/2025

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Jul-2025

CNR: RJHC020533782025

Filing Number

CW/30691/2025

Filing Date

23-Jun-2025

Registration No

CW/9720/2025

Registration Date

30-Jun-2025

Judge

Munnuri Laxman

Coram

Munnuri Laxman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Major Penalties ( 517 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR. BRIJ BALLABH SHARMA S/O SHRI SUA LAL SHARMA

    Adv. H.V. NANDWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - ARCHIT BOHRA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR, PROSECUTION

  3. 3.DIRECTOR (PENSION), DEPARTMENT OF PENSION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Munnuri LaxmanView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Rajasthan High Court allowed the writ petition filed by a retired Assistant Public Prosecutor, quashing disciplinary proceedings initiated against him. The court found that allegations relating to register maintenance errors (1994-95) were trivial in nature, the 13-year delay was unreasonable and unjustified, and the conversion from Rule 17 to Rule 16 proceedings just before his retirement constituted an abuse of power and act of vengeance. The court imposed ₹50,000 costs on the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Feb-2026

    Anand SharmaView PDF

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Sameer JainView PDF

  5. 14-Nov-2025

    Ashok Kumar JainView PDF

  6. 15-Sep-2025

    Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF

  7. 27-Aug-2025

    Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF

  8. 28-Jul-2025

    Mahendar Kumar GoyalView PDF

  9. 28-Jul-2025

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  10. 23-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/9720/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Rajasthan High Court allowed the writ petition filed by a retired Assistant Public Prosecutor, quashing disciplinary proceedings initiated against him. The court found that allegations relating to register maintenance errors (1994-95) were trivial in nature, the 13-year delay was unreasonable and unjustified, and the conversion from Rule 17 to Rule 16 proceedings just before his retirement constituted an abuse of power and act of vengeance. The court imposed ₹50,000 costs on the State. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case