SUHANI DHABHAI D/O SHRI GAJENDRA, W/O SHRI MAGRAJ, vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLW/885/2026

Case under The Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

CNR: RJHC020530292026

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

e-Filing Number

26-05-2026

Filing Number

CRLW/22278/2026

Filing Date

27-05-2026

Registration No

CRLW/885/2026

Registration Date

01-06-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Other Criminal matters ( 113 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Acts & Sections

The Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SUHANI DHABHAI D/O SHRI GAJENDRA, W/O SHRI MAGRAJ,

Adv. GOVIND GUPTA

MAGRAJ S/O SHRI LUNARAM,

Respondent(s)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (SOUTH),

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER (SHO),

GAJENDRA DHABHAI S/O LATE SHRI SATYANARAYAN,

GITANSH DHABHAI S/O SHRI GAJENDRA DHABHAI,

MOHAN LAL VERMA S/O NAMAUM,

SAURABH GURJAR S/O SHRI PANNA LAL GURJAR,

DEVENDRA DHABHAI S/O LATE SHRI SATYANARYAN,

Orders

05-06-2026
ASHUTOSH KUMAR (V.J.)

Case Summary: CRLW/885/2026 Two major adults, Suhani Dhabhai and Magraj, sought protection from threats to their life and liberty after solemnizing their marriage on 18.07.2025, which was disapproved by family members. The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the petition with directions to the Station House Officer, Police Station Muhana, to file an application and grant appropriate protective measures after analyzing threat perceptions, affirming the petitioners' constitutional right to protection under Article 21. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLW/885/2026 Two major adults, Suhani Dhabhai and Magraj, sought protection from threats to their life and liberty after solemnizing their marriage on 18.07.2025, which was disapproved by family members. The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the petition with directions to the Station House Officer, Police Station Muhana, to file an application and grant appropriate protective measures after analyzing threat perceptions, affirming the petitioners' constitutional right to protection under Article 21. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case