ASGARI W/O SAMSU vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/8594/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Jun-2026

CNR: RJHC020527492026

e-Filing Number

27-05-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/22131/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/8594/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Ravi Chirania (V.j.)

Coram

Ravi Chirania (V.j.)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASGARI W/O SAMSU

    Adv. ARAFAT HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Ravi Chirania (V.j.)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRLMB/8594/2026 The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Asgari W/o Samsu (81 years old) and four other female co-accused arrested in a 16-year-old case (FIR No.26/2010) involving charges under IPC Sections 147-149, 323, 332, 353, 307, PDPP Act, and Arms Act. The court found that since the main accused was already convicted in 2011 and trial concluded, there was no risk of trial interference. Bail was granted on conditions: Rs.1,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, bimonthly police station appearances, and automatic cancellation for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/8594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLMB/8594/2026 The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Asgari W/o Samsu (81 years old) and four other female co-accused arrested in a 16-year-old case (FIR No.26/2010) involving charges under IPC Sections 147-149, 323, 332, 353, 307, PDPP Act, and Arms Act. The court found that since the main accused was already convicted in 2011 and trial concluded, there was no risk of trial interference. Bail was granted on conditions: Rs.1,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, bimonthly police station appearances, and automatic cancellation for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case