GUGAN SON OF PALA vs RANJEET SON OF RAM NARAIN Advocate - GAURAV SINGH TANWAR — CW/10236/2023

Case under Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 230. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Next hearing 05-May-2026

CNR: RJHC020520822023

Filing Number

CW/28052/2023

Filing Date

06-Jul-2023

Registration No

CW/10236/2023

Registration Date

07-Jul-2023

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters against the orders of Board of Revenue ( 1804 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 230

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUGAN SON OF PALA

    Adv. RAM KISHAN SHARMA, ,SAMRADDHI SHARMA,BHRIGU SHARMA

  2. 2.PRABHU DAYAL SON OF PALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJEET SON OF RAM NARAIN Advocate - GAURAV SINGH TANWAR

  2. 2.GURUDAYAL SON OF HEMA

    Adv. SIKANDER ALI CHOPDAR

  3. 3.KAILASH SON OF HEMA

  4. 4.LAXMAN SON OF HEMA

  5. 5.BALBIR SON OF HEMA

  6. 6.SHIMBHU SON OF KHYALI SON OF HEMA

  7. 7.DHOLARAM SON OF KHYALI SON OF HEMA

  8. 8.SARLI WIFE OF KHYALI SON OF HEMA

  9. 9.SAVITRI D/O KHYALI SON OF HEMA

  10. 10.MOOLA SON OF SULTAN

  11. 11.PRATHVI SON OF SAMPAT SON OF SULTAN

  12. 12.JYANKI DEVI W/O SAMPAT SON SULTAN

  13. 13.CHITAR SON OF SRIRAM

  14. 14.MANGTU SON OF SRIRAM

  15. 15.ROSHAN SON OF SRIRAM

  16. 16.GHANSHYAM SON RAMOTAR SON OF SRIRAM

  17. 17.RAMKISH SON OF HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.

  18. 18.LEELARAM SON OF HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.

  19. 19.RAMPHOOL SON OF HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.

  20. 20.MATHARLI W/O HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.

  21. 21.DATARAM SON OF BHOORA

  22. 22.RAMESHWAR SON OF BHOORA.

  23. 23.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  24. 24.PATASI D/O PALA

  25. 25.SAJANA D/O PALA

  26. 26.BALESH D/O PALA

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Nupur BhatiView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan granted the petitioners' application for substituted service on respondents No.3 to 9, 11 to 21, and 24 to 26, who were deliberately avoiding service of notice. The court ordered that these respondents be served through newspaper publication in "Dainik Bhaskar" (Jaipur Edition). Requisites must be filed within two weeks, and the petitioners must subsequently file a copy of the published notice before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Dec-2023

    Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF

  4. 31-Oct-2023

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  5. 21-Aug-2023

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  6. 26-Jul-2023

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  7. 24-Jul-2023

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  8. 14-Jul-2023

    Inderjeet SinghView PDF

  9. 06-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/10236/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan granted the petitioners' application for substituted service on respondents No.3 to 9, 11 to 21, and 24 to 26, who were deliberately avoiding service of notice. The court ordered that these respondents be served through newspaper publication in "Dainik Bhaskar" (Jaipur Edition). Requisites must be filed within two weeks, and the petitioners must subsequently file a copy of the published notice before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case