GUGAN SON OF PALA vs RANJEET SON OF RAM NARAIN Advocate - GAURAV SINGH TANWAR — CW /10236/2023
Case under Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 230. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
CNR: RJHC020520822023
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
Filing Number
CW /28052/2023
Filing Date
06-07-2023
Registration No
CW /10236/2023
Registration Date
07-07-2023
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Matters against the orders of Board of Revenue ( 1804 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GUGAN SON OF PALA
Adv. RAM KISHAN SHARMA, ,SAMRADDHI SHARMA,BHRIGU SHARMA
PRABHU DAYAL SON OF PALA
Respondent(s)
RANJEET SON OF RAM NARAIN Advocate - GAURAV SINGH TANWAR
GURUDAYAL SON OF HEMA
Adv. SIKANDER ALI CHOPDAR
KAILASH SON OF HEMA
LAXMAN SON OF HEMA
BALBIR SON OF HEMA
SHIMBHU SON OF KHYALI SON OF HEMA
DHOLARAM SON OF KHYALI SON OF HEMA
SARLI WIFE OF KHYALI SON OF HEMA
SAVITRI D/O KHYALI SON OF HEMA
MOOLA SON OF SULTAN
PRATHVI SON OF SAMPAT SON OF SULTAN
JYANKI DEVI W/O SAMPAT SON SULTAN
CHITAR SON OF SRIRAM
MANGTU SON OF SRIRAM
ROSHAN SON OF SRIRAM
GHANSHYAM SON RAMOTAR SON OF SRIRAM
RAMKISH SON OF HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.
LEELARAM SON OF HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.
RAMPHOOL SON OF HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.
MATHARLI W/O HANUMAN SON OF SHYONARAYAN.
DATARAM SON OF BHOORA
RAMESHWAR SON OF BHOORA.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
PATASI D/O PALA
SAJANA D/O PALA
BALESH D/O PALA
Hearing History
FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-07-2023 | FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY) |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan granted the petitioners' application for substituted service on respondents No.3 to 9, 11 to 21, and 24 to 26, who were deliberately avoiding service of notice. The court ordered that these respondents be served through newspaper publication in "Dainik Bhaskar" (Jaipur Edition). Requisites must be filed within two weeks, and the petitioners must subsequently file a copy of the published notice before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan granted the petitioners' application for substituted service on respondents No.3 to 9, 11 to 21, and 24 to 26, who were deliberately avoiding service of notice. The court ordered that these respondents be served through newspaper publication in "Dainik Bhaskar" (Jaipur Edition). Requisites must be filed within two weeks, and the petitioners must subsequently file a copy of the published notice before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts