MARIYAM W/O HAKKU vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - HEMENDRA GOYAL — CRLMB/8447/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Jun-2026

CNR: RJHC020508642026

e-Filing Number

21-05-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/21375/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/8447/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Ravi Chirania (V.j.)

Coram

Ravi Chirania (V.j.)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MARIYAM W/O HAKKU

    Adv. SURENDRA SINGH, ,ANOOP KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - HEMENDRA GOYAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Ravi Chirania (V.j.)View PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to petitioners Mariyam W/o Hakku and Arsad S/o Isloop, arrested for offences under BNS 2023 (unlawful assembly, wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation) in FIR No.582/2021. The court allowed the bail application citing lack of specific allegations in the FIR (35-40 persons named generally), absence of criminal antecedents, and parity with similarly situated co-accused already granted bail. Each petitioner was released on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, with directions to appear for all hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Chandra Prakash Shrimali (Vj)View PDF

  5. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/8447/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to petitioners Mariyam W/o Hakku and Arsad S/o Isloop, arrested for offences under BNS 2023 (unlawful assembly, wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation) in FIR No.582/2021. The court allowed the bail application citing lack of specific allegations in the FIR (35-40 persons named generally), absence of criminal antecedents, and parity with similarly situated co-accused already granted bail. Each petitioner was released on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, with directions to appear for all hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case