HAKIM MOHAMMAD SON OF MANWAR KHAN vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLAS/1171/2026
Case under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (amendment) Act Section 14-A(2). Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
CNR: RJHC020497982026
Next Hearing
27th May 2026
e-Filing Number
20-05-2026
Filing Number
CRLAS/21003/2026
Filing Date
20-05-2026
Registration No
CRLAS/1171/2026
Registration Date
21-05-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Other Criminal matters ( 113 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAKIM MOHAMMAD SON OF MANWAR KHAN
Adv. SUSHEEL PUJARI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SURESH CHAND SON OF SHRI BHIYARAM,
Hearing History
FOR ORDERS- MISC. CASES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS- MISC. CASES |
Orders
Summary of CRLAS/1171/2026 Bail Granted. The Rajasthan High Court accepted bail applications filed under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for seven accused appellants, including Hakim Mohammad (petitioner in this case), who were arrested in connection with FIR No. 20/2026 involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 324(4) and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va), 3(2)(v). The Court found that while the accused had been in custody since January 26, 2026, it was unclear whether they inflicted fatal injuries on the victim, and considering similar co-accused had already been granted bail on May 19, 2026, their bail was approved subject to furnishing bonds of one lakh rupees and two sureties of fifty thousand rupees each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of CRLAS/1171/2026 Bail Granted. The Rajasthan High Court accepted bail applications filed under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for seven accused appellants, including Hakim Mohammad (petitioner in this case), who were arrested in connection with FIR No. 20/2026 involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 324(4) and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va), 3(2)(v). The Court found that while the accused had been in custody since January 26, 2026, it was unclear whether they inflicted fatal injuries on the victim, and considering similar co-accused had already been granted bail on May 19, 2026, their bail was approved subject to furnishing bonds of one lakh rupees and two sureties of fifty thousand rupees each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts