MAHENDRA KUMAR S/O TOTARAM, vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLAS/1126/2026

Case under The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 14A. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

CNR: RJHC020485682026

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

CRLAS/20554/2026

Filing Date

18-05-2026

Registration No

CRLAS/1126/2026

Registration Date

19-05-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Other Criminal matters ( 113 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Acts & Sections

The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 14A

Petitioner(s)

MAHENDRA KUMAR S/O TOTARAM,

Adv. SWAPNIL SINGH PATEL, ,SHIVANGI SINGH PATEL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

GYANSINGH S/O RATANSINGH,

Hearing History

02-06-2026

FOR ORDERS- MISC. CASES

Orders

02-06-2026
ASHUTOSH KUMAR (V.J.)

Summary of CRLAS/1126/2026: The Rajasthan High Court allowed Mahendra Kumar's criminal appeal and granted him bail. The appellant was charged under IPC sections 323, 341, 342, 365, 392 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 in FIR 162/2018. His bail plea was rejected by the trial court on 07.05.2026, but Justice Ashutosh Kumar found that bail was appropriate given the case circumstances and his status as an impoverished person. The court directed the appellant to furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each and to appear before the trial court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRLAS/1126/2026: The Rajasthan High Court allowed Mahendra Kumar's criminal appeal and granted him bail. The appellant was charged under IPC sections 323, 341, 342, 365, 392 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 in FIR 162/2018. His bail plea was rejected by the trial court on 07.05.2026, but Justice Ashutosh Kumar found that bail was appropriate given the case circumstances and his status as an impoverished person. The court directed the appellant to furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each and to appear before the trial court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case