SMT SHEELA DEVI JANGAM AND ORS BRIJ SHARMA/KAILASH vs ARVIND KUMAR AND ANR Advocate - JITENDRA SINGH — CMA/2873/2017
Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020358202017
Filing Number
CMA/8772/2017
Filing Date
24-May-2017
Registration No
CMA/2873/2017
Registration Date
30-May-2017
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Compensation Matters (MACT) ( 1700 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT SHEELA DEVI JANGAM AND ORS BRIJ SHARMA/KAILASH
-
2.Smt. Sheela Devi Jangam W/o Late Shri Basanti Lal Jangam
-
3.Pushpendra Jangam S/o Late Shri Basanti Lal Jangam
-
4.Sonu Jangam S/o Late Shri Basanti Lal Jangam
-
5.Kumari Seema Jangam D/o Late Shri Basanti Lal Jangam
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARVIND KUMAR AND ANR Advocate - JITENDRA SINGH
-
2.Arvind Kumar S/o Shri Chauth Mal, B/c Khatik,
-
3.United India Insurance Company Ltd. M.I. Road, Jaipur Through Its Manager insurer.
Case History
-
21-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Sandeep TanejaView PDF
Summary: In Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2873/2017 before the Rajasthan High Court, the court issued an interim order on the respondent's application to take additional documents on record under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. The court directed that the said application shall be considered at the time of hearing of the appeal, thereby adjourning consideration of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Anoop Kumar DhandView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Ashutosh KumarView PDF
-
03-Mar-2025
Uma Shanker VyasView PDF
-
06-Feb-2024
Narendra Singh DhaddhaView PDF
-
21-Mar-2023
Chandra Kumar SongaraView PDF
-
30-Jan-2023
Chandra Kumar SongaraView PDF
-
15-Nov-2018
Prakash GuptaView PDF
-
24-May-2017
Case filed
Registration No. CMA/2873/2017
Summary: In Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2873/2017 before the Rajasthan High Court, the court issued an interim order on the respondent's application to take additional documents on record under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. The court directed that the said application shall be considered at the time of hearing of the appeal, thereby adjourning consideration of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts