CHANDRA PRAKASH SOLANKI SON OF SHRI NAND LAL SOLANKI vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — HC/113/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.

Next hearing 11-May-2026

CNR: RJHC020349362026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

HC/20208/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

HC/113/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Other Habeas Corpus Cases ( 304 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRA PRAKASH SOLANKI SON OF SHRI NAND LAL SOLANKI

    Adv. ABDUL RAHIM KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.DY. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

  4. 4.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ANTI HUMAN TRAFFICKING UNIT

  5. 5.JITENDRA TANWAR SON OF SHRI SURESH TANWAR

  6. 6.OM PRAKASH SON OF MOHAN GOYAL

    Adv. PRAMESHWAR LAL PILANIA

Case History

  1. 11-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    Inderjeet Singh,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    Summary: The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Chandra Prakash Solanki. After reviewing statements from the person in question and her father, the court found that she is a married woman voluntarily residing at her in-laws' house and is not in illegal detention. The petitioner was ordered to deposit ₹1,00,000 as cost to the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. HC/113/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Chandra Prakash Solanki. After reviewing statements from the person in question and her father, the court found that she is a married woman voluntarily residing at her in-laws' house and is not in illegal detention. The petitioner was ordered to deposit ₹1,00,000 as cost to the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case