VISHAL PANWAR ALIAS ASHOK S/O SHRI JAGDISH PANWAR vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/5461/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020335212026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/14017/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/5461/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Praveer Bhatnagar

Coram

Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL PANWAR ALIAS ASHOK S/O SHRI JAGDISH PANWAR

    Adv. KRITIN SHARMA, ,SHALINI JAIMINI,INDU BALA SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to three accused persons (Ravikant, Santosh Kumar, and Vishal Panwar) in fraud cases involving forged property sale deeds and misappropriation of ₹3,80,000. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused conspired together, the co-accused Ashok Kumar actually executed the fraud against the complainant and alone received the money, making the accused merely witnesses rather than beneficiaries. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each, subject to appearance before the magistrate as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/5461/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to three accused persons (Ravikant, Santosh Kumar, and Vishal Panwar) in fraud cases involving forged property sale deeds and misappropriation of ₹3,80,000. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused conspired together, the co-accused Ashok Kumar actually executed the fraud against the complainant and alone received the money, making the accused merely witnesses rather than beneficiaries. Each accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each, subject to appearance before the magistrate as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case