VAKIL S/O ILIYAS vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/5700/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: RJHC020334322026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/13982/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/5700/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)

Coram

Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAKIL S/O ILIYAS

    Adv. RAHUL SINSINWAR

  2. 2.VASIM S/O AAS MOHAMMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)View PDF

    In case CRLMB/5700/2026, the Rajasthan High Court dismissed the bail application of Vakil S/o Iliyas as withdrawn but granted bail to co-petitioner Vasim S/o Aas Mohammad in connection with FIR No. 24/2026 involving charges under BNS and IT Act sections. The court allowed the bail application considering that the charge-sheet had been filed, the accused had been detained since February 22, 2026, had no criminal antecedents, and trial completion would take considerable time, requiring release on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/5700/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In case CRLMB/5700/2026, the Rajasthan High Court dismissed the bail application of Vakil S/o Iliyas as withdrawn but granted bail to co-petitioner Vasim S/o Aas Mohammad in connection with FIR No. 24/2026 involving charges under BNS and IT Act sections. The court allowed the bail application considering that the charge-sheet had been filed, the accused had been detained since February 22, 2026, had no criminal antecedents, and trial completion would take considerable time, requiring release on a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case