BUNTY SUMAN S/O SHRI MISHRILAL SUMAN vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLW/562/2026

Case under The Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020333062026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLW/13926/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLW/562/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Coram

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Parole ( 4400 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BUNTY SUMAN S/O SHRI MISHRILAL SUMAN

    Adv. MAYANK KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL JAIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the emergent parole petition of Bunty Suman, a life-sentence prisoner convicted under IPC Section 302, who sought 15 days parole citing his father's medical condition requiring cardiology treatment. The court agreed with the jail authorities' rejection, finding insufficient evidence that his father was critically ill and noting he had already received similar parole in December 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLW/562/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the emergent parole petition of Bunty Suman, a life-sentence prisoner convicted under IPC Section 302, who sought 15 days parole citing his father's medical condition requiring cardiology treatment. The court agreed with the jail authorities' rejection, finding insufficient evidence that his father was critically ill and noting he had already received similar parole in December 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case