PRAKASH S/O RAGHUPAT vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/5422/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020332332026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/13891/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/5422/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Coram

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH S/O RAGHUPAT

    Adv. YOGESH SINGHAL, ,SAROJ SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Pramil Kumar MathurView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Prakash, aged 26, in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 308(2), and 189(2). The court found that the petitioner's name was not mentioned in the FIR and the main allegations were attributed to principal offender Bhola, and that prolonged custody served no purpose given the trial's expected duration. Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, with a condition to appear at all subsequent court hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Pramil Kumar MathurView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/5422/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Prakash, aged 26, in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 308(2), and 189(2). The court found that the petitioner's name was not mentioned in the FIR and the main allegations were attributed to principal offender Bhola, and that prolonged custody served no purpose given the trial's expected duration. Bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each, with a condition to appear at all subsequent court hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case