SANTOSH KUMAR @ RAKESH S/O LATE SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD MOHD ISAQ ABBASI vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/5413/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020330462026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/13813/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/5413/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Praveer Bhatnagar

Coram

Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANTOSH KUMAR @ RAKESH S/O LATE SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD MOHD ISAQ ABBASI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

    Summary: The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to three petitioners (Ravikant, Santosh Kumar, and Vishal Panwar) accused under IPC sections 420, 406, and 120-B in a fraud case involving sale of a property. While the prosecution argued the petitioners conspired with co-accused Ashok Kumar to defraud the complainant of ₹3,80,000, the court found the evidence against them was circumstantial and noted they had been in custody for an extended period. The court accepted their bail applications on the condition of personal bonds of ₹50,000 each and two solvent sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/5413/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to three petitioners (Ravikant, Santosh Kumar, and Vishal Panwar) accused under IPC sections 420, 406, and 120-B in a fraud case involving sale of a property. While the prosecution argued the petitioners conspired with co-accused Ashok Kumar to defraud the complainant of ₹3,80,000, the court found the evidence against them was circumstantial and noted they had been in custody for an extended period. The court accepted their bail applications on the condition of personal bonds of ₹50,000 each and two solvent sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case