RAVIKANT @ RAVI @ RAHUL S/O LALCHAND vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/5412/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020330002026

e-Filing Number

05-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/13796/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/5412/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Praveer Bhatnagar

Coram

Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVIKANT @ RAVI @ RAHUL S/O LALCHAND

    Adv. MOHAR PAL MEENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to three petitioners (Ravikant, Santosh Kumar, and Vishal Panwar) in fraud/cheating cases under IPC sections 420, 406, and 120-B, finding that while co-accused Ashok Kumar executed the deed, the petitioners were merely witnesses. The court accepted bail applications considering prolonged custody and potential trial delays, ordering personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/5412/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to three petitioners (Ravikant, Santosh Kumar, and Vishal Panwar) in fraud/cheating cases under IPC sections 420, 406, and 120-B, finding that while co-accused Ashok Kumar executed the deed, the petitioners were merely witnesses. The court accepted bail applications considering prolonged custody and potential trial delays, ordering personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case