CHAMAN SINGH S/O SHRIGOVIND SINGH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/5410/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020323582026

e-Filing Number

02-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/13543/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/5410/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Praveer Bhatnagar

Coram

Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAMAN SINGH S/O SHRIGOVIND SINGH

    Adv. GIRISH KHANDELWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Chaman Singh in a fraud case involving a fake Vietnam tour scheme under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) IPC. While the prosecution alleged the petitioner conspired with others to defraud people of ₹1,76,000 through a WhatsApp group, the court found insufficient evidence linking the petitioner directly to the scheme and noted long investigation timelines. Bail was granted on condition of ₹50,000 personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/5410/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Chaman Singh in a fraud case involving a fake Vietnam tour scheme under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) IPC. While the prosecution alleged the petitioner conspired with others to defraud people of ₹1,76,000 through a WhatsApp group, the court found insufficient evidence linking the petitioner directly to the scheme and noted long investigation timelines. Bail was granted on condition of ₹50,000 personal bond and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case