RAJENDRA KUMAR @ RAJU S/O SHRI NATHULAL MEENA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - MAYANK GUPTA, ,DEEPAK KUMAR YOGI — CRLMB/5278/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020320622026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/13431/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/5278/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Praveer Bhatnagar

Coram

Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA KUMAR @ RAJU S/O SHRI NATHULAL MEENA

    Adv. AMITABH VIJAYWARGIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN Advocate - MAYANK GUPTA, ,DEEPAK KUMAR YOGI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Rajendra Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 318(4), 274, 275, 61(2), and violations of Copyright and Trade Mark Acts. The court found that the petitioner was merely transporting counterfeit goods as the vehicle driver without knowledge of the illegality, had no prior criminal record, and faced potential trial delay, warranting bail with conditions including personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/5278/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Rajendra Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 318(4), 274, 275, 61(2), and violations of Copyright and Trade Mark Acts. The court found that the petitioner was merely transporting counterfeit goods as the vehicle driver without knowledge of the illegality, had no prior criminal record, and faced potential trial delay, warranting bail with conditions including personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case