MUKESH KUMAR BAIRWA SON OF SHRI KAJOD MAL BAIRWA vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — HC/98/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

Next hearing 08-May-2026

CNR: RJHC020304852026

e-Filing Number

27-03-2026

Filing Number

HC/17694/2026

Filing Date

28-Mar-2026

Registration No

HC/98/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Other Habeas Corpus Cases ( 304 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUKESH KUMAR BAIRWA SON OF SHRI KAJOD MAL BAIRWA

    Adv. ALI MOHAMMED KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  3. 3.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  4. 4.S.H.O. POLICE STATION CHAKSU

  5. 5.MANISH KUMAR BAIRWA SON OF SHRI BHANWAR LAL BAIRWA

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    Summary: In this Habeas Corpus petition, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur adjourned the matter for two weeks, during which the Deputy Commissioner of Police assured the court that the detenu (Mukesh Kumar Bairwa) would be produced. The court warned that failure to comply would result in mandatory presence of concerned officers with a status report on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  7. 28-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. HC/98/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this Habeas Corpus petition, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur adjourned the matter for two weeks, during which the Deputy Commissioner of Police assured the court that the detenu (Mukesh Kumar Bairwa) would be produced. The court warned that failure to comply would result in mandatory presence of concerned officers with a status report on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case