SMT. KOMAL SHARMA DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI SITARAM SHARMA, WIFE OF SHRI MANMOHAN ALIAS SHANKAR, vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN, — HC/95/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Next hearing 23-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020291792026

e-Filing Number

24-03-2026

Filing Number

HC/16922/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

HC/95/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Coram

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Other Habeas Corpus Cases ( 304 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. KOMAL SHARMA DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI SITARAM SHARMA, WIFE OF SHRI MANMOHAN ALIAS SHANKAR,

    Adv. AMRIT PRASAD SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN,

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

  3. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

  4. 4.MANMOHAN @ SHANKAR SON OF SHRI PRABHU DAS MAHANT,

    Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR MEENA

  5. 5.SHEETAL DAUGHTER OF SHRI PRABHU DAS MAHANT

    Adv. BHUPESH MEENA

  6. 6.MANJU DEVI DAUGHTER OF SHRI PRABHU DAS MAHANT

  7. 7.PINKY DAUGHTER OF SHRI PRABHU DAS MAHANT

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    Summary: In Habeas Corpus Petition No. 95/2026 before the Rajasthan High Court, the case was adjourned. The court granted one week's time to the Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General and counsel for respondents No. 4-7 to file their reply, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. HC/95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Habeas Corpus Petition No. 95/2026 before the Rajasthan High Court, the case was adjourned. The court granted one week's time to the Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General and counsel for respondents No. 4-7 to file their reply, with the matter to be listed thereafter for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case