NEETU SACHDEVA W/O SUDEEP CHAKRAVARTI vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CW/5792/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020290112026

Filing Number

CW/16819/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CW/5792/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Anuroop Singhi

Coram

Anuroop Singhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEETU SACHDEVA W/O SUDEEP CHAKRAVARTI

    Adv. KANIKA BURMAN, ,NIRBHAY TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KVS

  3. 3.THE PRINCIPAL, KVS, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA NO.

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY SECRETARY, EDUCATION (GROUP-

  5. 5.DEPARTMENT

  6. 6.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

  7. 7.THE DEPUTY SECRETARY (ADMIN.), REVENUE DEPARTMENT

  8. 8.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER

  9. 9.THE TEHSILDAR, RAJGARH

  10. 10.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (PWD)

  11. 11.THE COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN (KVS)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the civil writ petition filed by Neetu Sachdeva against the State of Rajasthan and multiple government authorities (including KVS and various district officials) upon the petitioner's counsel's request for withdrawal. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a public interest litigation (PIL) to seek redressal of her grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/5792/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the civil writ petition filed by Neetu Sachdeva against the State of Rajasthan and multiple government authorities (including KVS and various district officials) upon the petitioner's counsel's request for withdrawal. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a public interest litigation (PIL) to seek redressal of her grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case