SAMEER S/O ABDUL SAEED @ MUNNA BHAI vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/4931/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020286902026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/11976/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/4931/2026

Registration Date

28-Mar-2026

Judge

Praveer Bhatnagar

Coram

Praveer Bhatnagar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMEER S/O ABDUL SAEED @ MUNNA BHAI

    Adv. ALI MOHAMMED KHAN, ,LAKSHAY KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Javed Sheikh and Sameer (Munna Bhai) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 309(4), 115(2), and 126(2). The court accepted the petitioners' argument that they had been falsely implicated, considering their prolonged judicial custody and the likelihood of lengthy trial proceedings. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including personal bonds of ₹50,000 each, two sureties of ₹25,000 each, monthly police station reporting, and address verification requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Praveer BhatnagarView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/4931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to Javed Sheikh and Sameer (Munna Bhai) in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 309(4), 115(2), and 126(2). The court accepted the petitioners' argument that they had been falsely implicated, considering their prolonged judicial custody and the likelihood of lengthy trial proceedings. Bail was granted on stringent conditions including personal bonds of ₹50,000 each, two sureties of ₹25,000 each, monthly police station reporting, and address verification requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case