AJAY KUMAR JANGIR S/O PAWAN KUMAR JANGIR vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CW/5494/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 09th April 2026.

CNR: RJHC020283282026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

CW/16417/2026

Filing Date

23-03-2026

Registration No

CW/5494/2026

Registration Date

23-03-2026

Judge

ANUROOP SINGHI

Coram

ANUROOP SINGHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters relating to Bank Loans and Transactions ( 3100 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

AJAY KUMAR JANGIR S/O PAWAN KUMAR JANGIR

Adv. YASH SONI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

STATION HOUSE OFFICER

HDFC BANK

DIG, CYBER CRIME

Hearing History

Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI

25-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)

Orders

25-03-2026
NUPUR BHATI
09-04-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI

Summary: The Rajasthan High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and directed HDFC Bank to partially unfreeze his account within three days. While the disputed amount of Rs. 13,794 (involved in alleged cyber fraud) remains frozen, the petitioner may withdraw and operate the account with remaining funds. The court reasoned that completely freezing an entire account based solely on alleged fraudulent transactions creates unjustified prejudice, and the bank can maintain a lien only on the disputed amount pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Rajasthan High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and directed HDFC Bank to partially unfreeze his account within three days. While the disputed amount of Rs. 13,794 (involved in alleged cyber fraud) remains frozen, the petitioner may withdraw and operate the account with remaining funds. The court reasoned that completely freezing an entire account based solely on alleged fraudulent transactions creates unjustified prejudice, and the bank can maintain a lien only on the disputed amount pending investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case