ABDUL GAFOOR S/O ILLAHIBUX vs LADU S/O NARAYANLAL 1. — CW/6328/2026
Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 88/188. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020281962026
Filing Number
CW/16352/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
CW/6328/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Matters against the orders of Board of Revenue ( 1804 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABDUL GAFOOR S/O ILLAHIBUX
Adv. NITESH PAREEK
Respondent(s)
-
1.LADU S/O NARAYANLAL 1.
-
2.MADHOLAL S/O LATE SHRI NARAYANLAL(Legal Heir)1.1.
-
3.DINESH S/O LATE SHRI MADHOLAL1.1.
-
4.RAMESH S/O LATE SHRI MADHOLAL
Adv. RAHUL TIWARI1.1.
-
5.RAMAVTAR S/O LATE SHRI MADHOLAL1.1.
-
6.RADHADEVI D/O LATE SHRI MADHOLAL
-
7.STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Anuroop SinghiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan admitted the civil writ petition and granted respondents six weeks to file their reply. The matter was adjourned and listed along with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7192/2016, with the court noting that revision petitions under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 lie only against final orders, not interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CW/6328/2026
Summary: The High Court of Rajasthan admitted the civil writ petition and granted respondents six weeks to file their reply. The matter was adjourned and listed along with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7192/2016, with the court noting that revision petitions under Section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 lie only against final orders, not interim orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts