PREM KUMAR S/O KAILASH CHAND vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — HC/85/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020272982026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

HC/15790/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

HC/85/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Coram

Mahendar Kumar Goyal , Bhuwan Goyal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Other Habeas Corpus Cases ( 304 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREM KUMAR S/O KAILASH CHAND

    Adv. CHANDRA SHEKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  3. 3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION JAJOD

  4. 4.SUNIL KUMAR S/O SATVEER SINGH

  5. 5.THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Prem Kumar seeking custody of his wife and minor daughters. The court found that the wife voluntarily left with the children and returned on her own, evidenced by her taking personal documents and jewelry, and thus they were not in illegal detention. Since the minor daughters are with their mother, they cannot be deemed illegally detained, making the habeas corpus petition without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. HC/85/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Prem Kumar seeking custody of his wife and minor daughters. The court found that the wife voluntarily left with the children and returned on her own, evidenced by her taking personal documents and jewelry, and thus they were not in illegal detention. Since the minor daughters are with their mother, they cannot be deemed illegally detained, making the habeas corpus petition without merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case