BHAGWAN SAHAYA SON OF LATE SHRICHITTAR vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CW/5746/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020266302026

Filing Number

CW/15337/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CW/5746/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Anuroop Singhi

Coram

Anuroop Singhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters ( 1600 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAGWAN SAHAYA SON OF LATE SHRICHITTAR

    Adv. HARSH SHARMA

  2. 2.SHANKAR LAL SON OF LATE SHRI CHITTAR

  3. 3.ROOPNARAYAN SON OF LATE SHRI CHITTAR

  4. 4.SMT. LAXMI DEVI WIFE OF SUWALAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

  3. 3.SECRETARY, RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by four petitioners seeking allotment letters for 15% developed land in exchange for their acquired khatedari land. Justice Anuroop Singhi directed the Secretary of Rajasthan Housing Board to decide the petitioners' compensation application dated 10.11.2025 within 15 days in accordance with law, without examining the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/5746/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by four petitioners seeking allotment letters for 15% developed land in exchange for their acquired khatedari land. Justice Anuroop Singhi directed the Secretary of Rajasthan Housing Board to decide the petitioners' compensation application dated 10.11.2025 within 15 days in accordance with law, without examining the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case