SARIKA KHANAM D/O SHRI SAMMI KHAN Mukesh Dudi, ,AVINASH CHOUDHARY vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/4466/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020265862026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/11202/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/4466/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Sameer Jain

Coram

Sameer Jain

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARIKA KHANAM D/O SHRI SAMMI KHAN Mukesh Dudi, ,AVINASH CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Sameer JainView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted three months interim bail to pregnant accused Sarika Khanam, citing Supreme Court precedent that expectant mothers should be temporarily released to avoid delivering in prison, relying on Article 21 of the Constitution and the principle that quality care for mother and child during early years outweighs custody concerns. The applicant must surrender on June 26, 2026, and refrain from unlawful activities during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Sameer JainView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/4466/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted three months interim bail to pregnant accused Sarika Khanam, citing Supreme Court precedent that expectant mothers should be temporarily released to avoid delivering in prison, relying on Article 21 of the Constitution and the principle that quality care for mother and child during early years outweighs custody concerns. The applicant must surrender on June 26, 2026, and refrain from unlawful activities during the interim period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case