SHEKHAR CHAND SANCHETI SON OF KHUSALCHAND SANCHETI vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CW /5608/2026

Case under The Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009 Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 30th March 2026.

CNR: RJHC020261692026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

30th March 2026

Filing Number

CW /15110/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

CW /5608/2026

Registration Date

24-03-2026

Judge

ANUROOP SINGHI

Coram

ANUROOP SINGHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Rajasthan Municipalities Act ( 5400 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

THE RAJASTHAN MUNICIPALITIES ACT, 2009 Section NO

Petitioner(s)

SHEKHAR CHAND SANCHETI SON OF KHUSALCHAND SANCHETI

Adv. DILIP SHARMA

SHREYANSH SANCHETI SON OF SHEKHAR CHAND SANCHETI

MANDIR MARGI PANCHAYAT OSWAL

Respondent(s)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

DIRECTOR OF LOCAL BODIES

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBAR KHARTARGACHH SANGH

Hearing History

Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI

30-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)

Orders

30-03-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Shekhar Chand Sancheti and others regarding Mandir Margi Panchayat Oswal matters. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a statutory appeal within ten days, directing that any such appeal be considered by the appropriate authority on its merits strictly in accordance with law in a time-bound manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Shekhar Chand Sancheti and others regarding Mandir Margi Panchayat Oswal matters. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a statutory appeal within ten days, directing that any such appeal be considered by the appropriate authority on its merits strictly in accordance with law in a time-bound manner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case