PRAVEEN KUMAR LAMBORIYA, S/O ROHITASH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — SOSA/514/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020240732026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

SOSA/10039/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

SOSA/514/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Inderjeet Singh , Bhuwan Goyal

Coram

Inderjeet Singh , Bhuwan Goyal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVEEN KUMAR LAMBORIYA, S/O ROHITASH

    Adv. VED PRAKASH BISHNOI

  2. 2.KARAMVEER SINGH DHEVA, S/O MAHENDRA SINGH,

    Adv. VED PRAKASH BISHNOI

  3. 3.UMEED SINGH BENIWAL, S/O HOSHIYAR SINGH,

    Adv. VED PRAKASH BISHNOI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Inderjeet Singh,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court allowed suspension of sentence applications for four accused convicted of murder under IPC Section 302/149, finding that they were neither named in the FIR nor the complainant's statement, eyewitnesses turned hostile, forensic evidence was negative, and one recovery was made 50 days after arrest. The Court suspended their life imprisonment sentences and granted bail pending appeal, citing weak prosecution evidence and the lengthy appeal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    For Orders- Misc. Cases

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SOSA/514/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court allowed suspension of sentence applications for four accused convicted of murder under IPC Section 302/149, finding that they were neither named in the FIR nor the complainant's statement, eyewitnesses turned hostile, forensic evidence was negative, and one recovery was made 50 days after arrest. The Court suspended their life imprisonment sentences and granted bail pending appeal, citing weak prosecution evidence and the lengthy appeal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case