KISHANLAL vs BADRI — CW /5348/2026

Case under Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 223. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

CNR: RJHC020240172026

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

CW /13939/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

CW /5348/2026

Registration Date

19-03-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters against the orders of Board of Revenue ( 1804 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Acts & Sections

RAJASTHAN TENANCY ACT 1955 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

KISHANLAL

Adv. PRAHLAD SHARMA

FELIRAM

MOHARPAL SON OF RAMU (DECEASED)(Legal Heir)3.

RAMESH3.

MUKESH3.

BABULAL3.

DHOLI WIFE OF MOHARPAL3.

LALI DAUGHTER OF MOHARPAL, WIFE OF PRAHLAD

CHOTILAL SON OF RAMU(Legal Heir)4.

SHANKARLAL4.

KAJODI WIFE OF CHOTILAL

KAJOD

PANCHU SON OF RAMU

KAMLI WIFE OF SITARAM, DAUGHTER OF RAMU

Respondent(s)

BADRI

VISHRAM

BHARATLAL

RAMKESH SON OF BADRI

JAGDISH SON OF KALU (DECEASED)(Legal Heir)5.

GHAMANDILAL5.

GALLIRAM5.

DILKUSH SON OF JAGDISH5.

ANOKH DAUGHTER OF LATE JAGDISH5.

MUKHRI DAUGHTER OF JAGDISH WIFE OF KALURAM5.

SEEMA DAUGTHER OF JAGDISH WIFE OF BHORILAL

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Hearing History

24-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)

Orders

24-03-2026
NUPUR BHATI

Case Status Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 5348/2026 before the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur, the court issued notice to the respondent (Badri) returnable within two weeks. The notice was directed to be served on the respondent through the petitioner's counsel via "Dasti" (personal service). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 5348/2026 before the Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur, the court issued notice to the respondent (Badri) returnable within two weeks. The notice was directed to be served on the respondent through the petitioner's counsel via "Dasti" (personal service). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case