SANJAY SINGH SON OF SHRI CHARAN SINGH vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CW/4493/2026

Case under Other Acts Section no. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020224082026

Filing Number

CW/12935/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

CW/4493/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Anuroop Singhi

Coram

Anuroop Singhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters relating to Bank Loans and Transactions ( 3100 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section no

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY SINGH SON OF SHRI CHARAN SINGH

    Adv. KOMAL KUMARI GIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.BRANCH MANAGER, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

    Adv. MR. VIKASH JAIN,

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted partial relief to the petitioner whose bank account was frozen due to a cyber fraud complaint involving Rs. 12,950. The court ordered the bank to de-freeze the account within three days and allow normal transactions on all amounts except the disputed Rs. 12,950, finding that freezing the entire account would unfairly prejudice the petitioner's rights. The petitioner must cooperate with investigating agencies and cannot close the account until permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/4493/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted partial relief to the petitioner whose bank account was frozen due to a cyber fraud complaint involving Rs. 12,950. The court ordered the bank to de-freeze the account within three days and allow normal transactions on all amounts except the disputed Rs. 12,950, finding that freezing the entire account would unfairly prejudice the petitioner's rights. The petitioner must cooperate with investigating agencies and cannot close the account until permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case