BANK OF BARODA vs SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE — CW/5068/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020193552026

Filing Number

CW/11072/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

CW/5068/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Nupur Bhati

Coram

Nupur Bhati

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters relating to Bank Loans and Transactions ( 3100 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF BARODA

    Adv. ANUBHA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

  2. 2.STATION HOUSE OFFICER

  3. 3.MR. MANOJ GANDHI S/O SHRI JAY KUMAR GANDHI

  4. 4.MR. JAY KUMAR GANDHI S/O SHRI GURU DATTA MAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Nupur BhatiView PDF

    Summary The Rajasthan High Court allowed Bank of Baroda's writ petition and directed police authorities to restore possession of mortgaged property to the bank within six weeks. The court found that borrowers unlawfully retook possession of the property after the bank had legally seized it following loan default proceedings under the Securitisation Act, 2002, and held that police must enforce rule of law and prevent such forcible dispossession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (Without Stay)

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/5068/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court allowed Bank of Baroda's writ petition and directed police authorities to restore possession of mortgaged property to the bank within six weeks. The court found that borrowers unlawfully retook possession of the property after the bank had legally seized it following loan default proceedings under the Securitisation Act, 2002, and held that police must enforce rule of law and prevent such forcible dispossession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case