M/S ARPITA BUILD MART PVT LTD. vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER — CW/3970/2026

Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020184442026

Filing Number

CW/10571/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

CW/3970/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Anuroop Singhi

Coram

Anuroop Singhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S ARPITA BUILD MART PVT LTD.

    Adv. G P SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AUTHORIZED OFFICER

    Adv. ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA,VED PRAKASH TRIPATHI 1123

  2. 2.MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ

    Adv. V.D. GATHALA AGC

  3. 3.STATE GOVERNMENT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

    The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of 11 interconnected civil writ petitions by directing the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer to expeditiously decide pending appeals within four months, with all parties maintaining status-quo on the disputed land and its records until final disposal. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by previous lower court orders, and allowed applicants liberty to seek impleadment of additional persons before the Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Nupur BhatiView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/3970/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of 11 interconnected civil writ petitions by directing the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer to expeditiously decide pending appeals within four months, with all parties maintaining status-quo on the disputed land and its records until final disposal. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by previous lower court orders, and allowed applicants liberty to seek impleadment of additional persons before the Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case