SHRI KAILASH CHAND S/O BHANWAR LAL vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER, NAGAR PARISHAD KISHANGARH — CW /3958/2026
Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020183042026
Next Hearing
06th March 2026
Filing Number
CW /10487/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
CW /3958/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Judge
ANUROOP SINGHI
Coram
ANUROOP SINGHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI KAILASH CHAND S/O BHANWAR LAL
Adv. G P SHARMA
Respondent(s)
AUTHORIZED OFFICER, NAGAR PARISHAD KISHANGARH
Adv. ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA,VED PRAKASH TRIPATHI 1123
MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ
Adv. V.G. GATHALA AGC
STATE GOVERNMENT
Hearing History
Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI
FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY) |
Orders
The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 interconnected civil writ petitions involving land disputes in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer to expeditiously decide pending appeals within four months while maintaining status-quo on the disputed land. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by prior orders dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Commissioner on their merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 interconnected civil writ petitions involving land disputes in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer to expeditiously decide pending appeals within four months while maintaining status-quo on the disputed land. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by prior orders dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Commissioner on their merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts