GAURAV KUMAR PRAJAPAT S/O KAILASH CHAND PRAJAPAT vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — HC /50/2026
Case under Other Acts Section NO. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020180982026
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
HC /10358/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
HC /50/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Judge
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL , SAMEER JAIN
Coram
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL , SAMEER JAIN
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Other Habeas Corpus Cases ( 304 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAURAV KUMAR PRAJAPAT S/O KAILASH CHAND PRAJAPAT
Adv. KULDEEP SINGH MEENA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
ADD. D.G.P. ANTI HUMAN TRAFFICKING UNIT
S.H.O, POLICE STATION JAMDOLI
DCP (Deputy Commissioner of Police), JAIPUR EAST
KAMLESH BAIRWA
DHANRAJ BAIRWA S/O RATAN LAL BAIRWA
Hearing History
Judge: MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL , SAMEER JAIN
FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITHOUT STAY)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITHOUT STAY) |
Orders
Summary: The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by Gaurav Kumar Prajapat seeking custody of his wife (Ms. 'NP'). The Court found the petition not maintainable because Ms. 'NP', being a major, appeared before the Court and confirmed she was residing with Kamlesh Bairwa of her own free will and was not in illegal detention. The Court ruled that the petitioner's marital status and allegations against Bairwa did not grant jurisdiction to interfere in the matter. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to the Mukhyamantri Vidyadaan Kosh within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by Gaurav Kumar Prajapat seeking custody of his wife (Ms. 'NP'). The Court found the petition not maintainable because Ms. 'NP', being a major, appeared before the Court and confirmed she was residing with Kamlesh Bairwa of her own free will and was not in illegal detention. The Court ruled that the petitioner's marital status and allegations against Bairwa did not grant jurisdiction to interfere in the matter. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 25,000 to the Mukhyamantri Vidyadaan Kosh within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts