M/S LOVELY COLONIZERS PVT. LTD. vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER, NAGAR PARISHAD KISHANGARH — CW /3971/2026

Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.

CNR: RJHC020180712026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th March 2026

Filing Number

CW /10331/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

CW /3971/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Judge

ANUROOP SINGHI

Coram

ANUROOP SINGHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A

Petitioner(s)

M/S LOVELY COLONIZERS PVT. LTD.

Adv. G P SHARMA

KUSUM CHOUDHARY W/O SHRI PRADEEP CHOUDHARY

Respondent(s)

AUTHORIZED OFFICER, NAGAR PARISHAD KISHANGARH

Adv. ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA 1123

MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ

Adv. V.D. GATHALA AGC

STATE GOVERNMENT

Hearing History

Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI

06-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)

Orders

06-03-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI
25-03-2026
NUPUR BHATI
30-03-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI
16-04-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI

Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions challenging a Divisional Commissioner's order regarding disputed land in Kishangarh, Ajmer district. The court directed the Divisional Commissioner to expeditiously decide all pending appeals and related applications within four months, while maintaining status-quo over the land and its records until the appeals are resolved. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by the earlier impugned order dated 21.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions challenging a Divisional Commissioner's order regarding disputed land in Kishangarh, Ajmer district. The court directed the Divisional Commissioner to expeditiously decide all pending appeals and related applications within four months, while maintaining status-quo over the land and its records until the appeals are resolved. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by the earlier impugned order dated 21.01.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case