M/S ARPITA BUILDMART PVT. LTD. vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER — CW/4033/2026

Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Mar-2026

CNR: RJHC020180642026

Filing Number

CW/10325/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

CW/4033/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Anuroop Singhi

Coram

Anuroop Singhi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S ARPITA BUILDMART PVT. LTD.

    Adv. G P SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AUTHORIZED OFFICER

    Adv. ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA 1123

  2. 2.MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ

    Adv. G.S. GILL, AAG

  3. 3.STATE GOVERNMENT THROUGH TEHSILDAR

    Adv. KUNDAN SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions concerning a land dispute in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner of Ajmer to decide the pending appeals expeditiously within four months, while maintaining status-quo over the land until final disposal. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by previous order observations, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Commissioner on their own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Nupur BhatiView PDF

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/4033/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions concerning a land dispute in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner of Ajmer to decide the pending appeals expeditiously within four months, while maintaining status-quo over the land until final disposal. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by previous order observations, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Commissioner on their own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case