M/S ARPITA BUILDMART PVT. LTD. vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER — CW /4033/2026
Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020180642026
Next Hearing
06th March 2026
Filing Number
CW /10325/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
CW /4033/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Judge
ANUROOP SINGHI
Coram
ANUROOP SINGHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S ARPITA BUILDMART PVT. LTD.
Adv. G P SHARMA
Respondent(s)
AUTHORIZED OFFICER
Adv. ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA 1123
MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ
Adv. G.S. GILL, AAG
STATE GOVERNMENT THROUGH TEHSILDAR
Adv. KUNDAN SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI
FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY) |
Orders
The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions concerning a land dispute in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner of Ajmer to decide the pending appeals expeditiously within four months, while maintaining status-quo over the land until final disposal. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by previous order observations, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Commissioner on their own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions concerning a land dispute in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner of Ajmer to decide the pending appeals expeditiously within four months, while maintaining status-quo over the land until final disposal. The court clarified that the Appellate Authority must decide the appeals independently without being influenced by previous order observations, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Commissioner on their own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts