KAILASH CHAND S/O SHRI BHANWAR LAL vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER Advocate - VED PRAKASH TRIPATHI, ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA — CW /3975/2026
Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020180552026
Filing Number
CW /10318/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
CW /3975/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Judge
ANUROOP SINGHI
Coram
ANUROOP SINGHI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAILASH CHAND S/O SHRI BHANWAR LAL
Adv. G P SHARMA
SMT. GOMATI DEVI W/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND
M/S ARPITA BUILDMART PVT. LTD.
M/S LOVELY COLONIZERS PVT. LTD.
Respondent(s)
AUTHORIZED OFFICER Advocate - VED PRAKASH TRIPATHI, ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA
MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ
STATE GOVERNMENT
Orders
Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions challenging a land dispute order from the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer, by directing the Divisional Commissioner to decide all pending appeals and preliminary objections expeditiously within four months while maintaining status-quo on the disputed land. The court clarified that the appellate authority must decide the appeals independently, uninfluenced by the previous order dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants liberty to seek impleadment of additional parties before the Divisional Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions challenging a land dispute order from the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer, by directing the Divisional Commissioner to decide all pending appeals and preliminary objections expeditiously within four months while maintaining status-quo on the disputed land. The court clarified that the appellate authority must decide the appeals independently, uninfluenced by the previous order dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants liberty to seek impleadment of additional parties before the Divisional Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts