KAILASH CHAND S/O SHRI BHANWAR LAL vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER Advocate - VED PRAKASH TRIPATHI, ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA — CW /3975/2026

Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.

CNR: RJHC020180552026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CW /10318/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

CW /3975/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Judge

ANUROOP SINGHI

Coram

ANUROOP SINGHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A

Petitioner(s)

KAILASH CHAND S/O SHRI BHANWAR LAL

Adv. G P SHARMA

SMT. GOMATI DEVI W/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND

M/S ARPITA BUILDMART PVT. LTD.

M/S LOVELY COLONIZERS PVT. LTD.

Respondent(s)

AUTHORIZED OFFICER Advocate - VED PRAKASH TRIPATHI, ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA

MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ

STATE GOVERNMENT

Orders

13-03-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI
25-03-2026
NUPUR BHATI
30-03-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI
16-04-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI

Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions challenging a land dispute order from the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer, by directing the Divisional Commissioner to decide all pending appeals and preliminary objections expeditiously within four months while maintaining status-quo on the disputed land. The court clarified that the appellate authority must decide the appeals independently, uninfluenced by the previous order dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants liberty to seek impleadment of additional parties before the Divisional Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions challenging a land dispute order from the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer, by directing the Divisional Commissioner to decide all pending appeals and preliminary objections expeditiously within four months while maintaining status-quo on the disputed land. The court clarified that the appellate authority must decide the appeals independently, uninfluenced by the previous order dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants liberty to seek impleadment of additional parties before the Divisional Commissioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case