SMT. GOMATI DEVI W/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER Advocate - GURU CHARAN SINGH GILL, ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA — CW /3977/2026

Case under Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.

CNR: RJHC020180462026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th March 2026

Filing Number

CW /10313/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

CW /3977/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Judge

ANUROOP SINGHI

Coram

ANUROOP SINGHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE AND TENANCY MATTERS ( 1800 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956 Section 90-A

Petitioner(s)

SMT. GOMATI DEVI W/O SHRI KAILASH CHAND

Adv. G P SHARMA

Respondent(s)

AUTHORIZED OFFICER Advocate - GURU CHARAN SINGH GILL, ,VIDYADHAR GATHALA

MANDIR MURTI SHRI YUGAL KISHORE JI MAHARAJ

Adv. V. D. GATHALA AGC

STATE GOVERNMENT

Adv. VED PRAKASH TRIPATHI

Hearing History

Judge: ANUROOP SINGHI

06-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION- FRESH (WITH STAY)

Orders

06-03-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI
25-03-2026
NUPUR BHATI
30-03-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI
16-04-2026
ANUROOP SINGHI

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions relating to a land dispute in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer to expeditiously decide pending appeals within four months while maintaining status-quo over the disputed land and its records. The court clarified that the appellate authority must decide independently without being influenced by previous orders dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Divisional Commissioner on their own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court disposed of 11 consolidated civil writ petitions relating to a land dispute in Kishangarh by directing the Divisional Commissioner, Ajmer to expeditiously decide pending appeals within four months while maintaining status-quo over the disputed land and its records. The court clarified that the appellate authority must decide independently without being influenced by previous orders dated 21.01.2026, and allowed applicants to file impleadment applications before the Divisional Commissioner on their own merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case