SATYANARAYAN SON OF KANHAIYALAL vs PURUSHOTTAM DAYAL SON OF KANHAIYALAL — CW/5111/2026

Case under Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 224. Status: Incomplete. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Incomplete Next hearing 06-May-2026 this date has passed

CNR: RJHC020175522026

Filing Number

CW/10049/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

CW/5111/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters against the orders of Board of Revenue ( 1804 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 05-Sep-2026

Acts & Sections

Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955 Section 224

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYANARAYAN SON OF KANHAIYALAL

    Adv. BHIM SINGH MEENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PURUSHOTTAM DAYAL SON OF KANHAIYALAL

  2. 2.SMT. GEETA BAI WIFE OF MAHESH KUMAR BRAHMIN

  3. 3.SMT. KAILASH BAI WIFE OF OM PRAKASH BRAHMIN

  4. 4.MOHAN LAL SON OF GANPAT LAL

  5. 5.SATYANARAYAN SON OF GANPAT LAL

  6. 6.SHIVNARAYAN SON OF MORDHWAJ BRAHMIN

  7. 7.NEMICHAND SON OF MORDHWAJ BRAHMIN

  8. 8.BHAGWAN SON OF MORDHWAJ BRAHMIN

  9. 9.RAMSHANKAR DAUGHTER OF MORDHWAJ

  10. 10.RADHEYSHYAM SON OF MORDHWAJ

  11. 11.NANDKUNWAR WIFE OF JAGDISH BRAHMIN

  12. 12.GIRIRAJ BAI WIFE OF MOHANLAL BRAHMIN

  13. 13.SURESH KUMAR SON OF SATYANARAYAN

  14. 14.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/5111/2026

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case