AJRUDDIN S/O SHER MOHAMMAD Ankit Khandelwal vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/3315/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020158202026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/6786/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/3315/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Judge

Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)

Coram

Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJRUDDIN S/O SHER MOHAMMAD Ankit Khandelwal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Sangeeta Sharma (V.j.)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRLMB/3315/2026 The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to four accused, including Ajruddin S/o Sher Mohammad, charged with cyber fraud offenses under BNS and IT Act. The court found that since the accused had no criminal antecedents, had been in custody since January 2026, a co-accused juvenile was already granted bail, and trial would be prolonged, continued detention served no purpose. Each accused was released on Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, with conditions to appear in court and avoid further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/3315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLMB/3315/2026 The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to four accused, including Ajruddin S/o Sher Mohammad, charged with cyber fraud offenses under BNS and IT Act. The court found that since the accused had no criminal antecedents, had been in custody since January 2026, a co-accused juvenile was already granted bail, and trial would be prolonged, continued detention served no purpose. Each accused was released on Rs. 1,00,000 personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, with conditions to appear in court and avoid further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case