MANGLA RAM S/O SHRI NATHURAM JIYA UR RAHMAN vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/2427/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th February 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Feb-2026

CNR: RJHC020130052026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/5668/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/2427/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Judge

Shubha Mehta

Coram

Shubha Mehta

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

26-Feb-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANGLA RAM S/O SHRI NATHURAM JIYA UR RAHMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Shubha MehtaView PDF

    The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to Mangla Ram, accused under the NDPS Act 1985, after finding that 33 kilos of MDMA recovered from his possession was below the commercial quantity threshold of 50 kilos, coupled with his clean criminal history and custody since January 27, 2026. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of one lakh rupees, two sureties of fifty thousand each, monthly appearance at the police station, and a promise not to repeat such offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Shubha MehtaView PDF

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/2427/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to Mangla Ram, accused under the NDPS Act 1985, after finding that 33 kilos of MDMA recovered from his possession was below the commercial quantity threshold of 50 kilos, coupled with his clean criminal history and custody since January 27, 2026. The court imposed bail conditions including a bond of one lakh rupees, two sureties of fifty thousand each, monthly appearance at the police station, and a promise not to repeat such offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case