SMT RAM DEVI AND OTHERS JAI PRAKASH GUPTA vs R S R T C AND ANOTHER Advocate - YASH JOSHI — CMA/1230/2012
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 27th March 2026.
CNR: RJHC020125642012
Filing Number
CMA/3170/2012
Filing Date
06-Mar-2012
Registration No
CMA/1230/2012
Registration Date
22-Mar-2012
Judge
Sandeep Taneja
Coram
Sandeep Taneja
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Compensation Matters (MACT) ( 1700 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT RAM DEVI AND OTHERS JAI PRAKASH GUPTA
-
2.Smt. Ramdevi W/o Late Laxman Das, by Caste Brahmin
-
3.Om Prakash S/o Shri Laxman Das, by Caste Brahmin
-
4.Ravi Prakash S/o Laxman Das, by Caste Brahmin
-
5.Kusum D/o Laxman Das, by Caste Brahmin
Respondent(s)
-
1.R S R T C AND ANOTHER Advocate - YASH JOSHI
-
2.Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
Adv. ASHISH KUMAR SHARMA
-
3.Saudan Singh S/o Ramhet, by Caste Jat
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Sandeep TanejaView PDF
Summary The Rajasthan High Court enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs. 7,43,832 to Rs. 23,81,727 (net increase of Rs. 16,37,895) for the family of a deceased bus conductor. The court held that pension cannot be deducted from income when calculating compensation, and added 30% for future prospects, increased consortium and funeral expenses, and applied a multiplier of 13 based on the deceased's age of 48 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Sandeep TanejaView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
For Admission- Notice Served
K. S. Jhaveri
-
05-Mar-2025
Uma Shanker VyasView PDF
-
04-Jan-2024
Uma Shanker VyasView PDF
-
06-Mar-2012
Case filed
Registration No. CMA/1230/2012
Summary The Rajasthan High Court enhanced motor accident compensation from Rs. 7,43,832 to Rs. 23,81,727 (net increase of Rs. 16,37,895) for the family of a deceased bus conductor. The court held that pension cannot be deducted from income when calculating compensation, and added 30% for future prospects, increased consortium and funeral expenses, and applied a multiplier of 13 based on the deceased's age of 48 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts