M/S MKS ENTERPRISES vs THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER — CW/2074/2026

Case under Other Acts Section NO. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: RJHC020103252026

Filing Number

CW/5735/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

CW/2074/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Matters relating to Bank Loans and Transactions ( 3100 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Acts Section NO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S MKS ENTERPRISES

    Adv. ROHIT RAJLIWAL,ABHAY SINGHAL,ABHAY SINGHAL, ,ABHAY SINGHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. ,GANESH SHARMA 1123

  2. 2.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

    Adv. SOMITRA CHATURVEDI

  3. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

  4. 4.DIRECTOR, NATIONAL CRIME RECORD BUREAU

  5. 5.INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Nupur BhatiView PDF

    Summary: The case involving M/s Mks Enterprises challenging a bank account freeze has been adjourned for two weeks. The court directed that the DIG, Cyber Crime, Police Head Quarters, Rajasthan must be made a mandatory party respondent, and the petitioner's counsel was instructed to supply case copies to the Deputy General Counsel for completion of instructions before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Anuroop SinghiView PDF

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    For Admission- Fresh (With Stay)

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CW/2074/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case involving M/s Mks Enterprises challenging a bank account freeze has been adjourned for two weeks. The court directed that the DIG, Cyber Crime, Police Head Quarters, Rajasthan must be made a mandatory party respondent, and the petitioner's counsel was instructed to supply case copies to the Deputy General Counsel for completion of instructions before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case