SURAJ CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI RANJEET VISHAL GURJAR vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/1898/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Feb-2026

CNR: RJHC020092392026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

CRLMB/4100/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLMB/1898/2026

Registration Date

27-Jan-2026

Judge

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Coram

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURAJ CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI RANJEET VISHAL GURJAR

  2. 2.DILKHUSH S/O SHRI BABULAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Pramil Kumar MathurView PDF

    The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to petitioners Suraj Choudhary and Dilkhush in FIR No. 357/2025 for offences under Section 309(4) BNS 2023. The court found merit in their arguments that they were falsely implicated, no recovery was made from them, and the alleged amount was already recovered from co-accused Surendra, coupled with their prolonged custody since December 2025. They were released on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLMB/1898/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Rajasthan High Court granted bail to petitioners Suraj Choudhary and Dilkhush in FIR No. 357/2025 for offences under Section 309(4) BNS 2023. The court found merit in their arguments that they were falsely implicated, no recovery was made from them, and the alleged amount was already recovered from co-accused Surendra, coupled with their prolonged custody since December 2025. They were released on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case