M/S. JYOTI BUILDERS vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - TANVEER AHAMAD — CW/1754/2026
Case under Other Acts Section NO. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.
CNR: RJHC020090062026
Filing Number
CW/4997/2026
Filing Date
24-Jan-2026
Registration No
CW/1754/2026
Registration Date
24-Jan-2026
Judge
Ganesh Ram Meena
Coram
Ganesh Ram Meena
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SB Writ Petitions which are not covered under any of the above sub categories ( 4300 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. JYOTI BUILDERS
Adv. SARANSH GHIYA,BHRIGU SHARMA,BHRIGU SHARMA, ,BHRIGU SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - TANVEER AHAMAD
-
2.THE GENERAL MANAGER
-
3.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Jyoti Builders' petition challenging RSRDC's directions to use only specified steel brands (SAIL, VIZAG-RINL, TATA TISCON) for bridge construction. The court held that special contract conditions prevail over government circulars and the contractor, having accepted the contract terms with full knowledge, cannot deviate from them for financial benefits. The court found no illegality in the respondent's enforcement letters and ordered removal of any non-compliant steel already used. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
For Admission- Notice Not Issued
-
30-Jan-2026
Maneesh SharmaView PDF
-
24-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CW/1754/2026
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed Jyoti Builders' petition challenging RSRDC's directions to use only specified steel brands (SAIL, VIZAG-RINL, TATA TISCON) for bridge construction. The court held that special contract conditions prevail over government circulars and the contractor, having accepted the contract terms with full knowledge, cannot deviate from them for financial benefits. The court found no illegality in the respondent's enforcement letters and ordered removal of any non-compliant steel already used. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts