MAHESH KUMAR SON OF MANGALCHAND vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLW/121/2026

Case under The Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 24th February 2026.

Next hearing 24-Feb-2026

CNR: RJHC020060812026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

CRLW/2766/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRLW/121/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Parole ( 4400 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL

Last updated 09-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESH KUMAR SON OF MANGALCHAND

    Adv. TEKCHAND SWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN

  2. 2.THE PRISONS PAROLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (STATE COMMITTEE)

  3. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL JAIL

Case History

  1. 24-Feb-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

    Case Adjourned In D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 7/2026, the High Court of Rajasthan granted the petitioner's counsel four weeks' additional time to prepare arguments in the parole petition. The matter has been adjourned and will be listed for hearing after the completion of the preparation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,bhuwan GoyalView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sameer JainView PDF

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    For Admission- Notice Served

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sameer JainView PDF

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,sameer JainView PDF

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Mahendar Kumar Goyal,chandra Prakash ShrimaliView PDF

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLW/121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Adjourned In D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 7/2026, the High Court of Rajasthan granted the petitioner's counsel four weeks' additional time to prepare arguments in the parole petition. The matter has been adjourned and will be listed for hearing after the completion of the preparation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case