DEEPAK @ DEEPU S/O HANUMAN vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN — CRLMB/948/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th February 2026.
CNR: RJHC020051662026
e-Filing Number
13-01-2026
Filing Number
CRLMB/2334/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
CRLMB/948/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Judge
Shubha Mehta
Coram
Shubha Mehta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Bail Applications under Section 439 CrPC ( 202 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL
Decision Date
26-Feb-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK @ DEEPU S/O HANUMAN
Adv. RAJENDRA SINGH TANWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. ,DHARMRAJ BAIRWA,ASHISH BAIRWA,SUSHMITA KUMARI 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Shubha MehtaView PDF
Summary: The Rajasthan High Court rejected the bail application of Deepak (age 22) accused under serious charges including IPC sections 121(1), 132, 352, 324(3), 109(1), 3(5) and SC/ST Act provisions. Justice Shubha Mehta found that the petitioner, along with co-accused, allegedly assaulted a police constable with a baseball bat, causing six injuries including a serious head wound on the parietal region. The court held that given the gravity of offenses, the ongoing investigation, medical reports still pending, and the petitioner's prior violation of peace bond conditions, bail was not appropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Feb-2026
For Orders (439 Cr.p.c./483 Bnss)
-
11-Feb-2026
Shubha MehtaView PDF
-
31-Jan-2026
Pramil Kumar MathurView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Ganesh Ram MeenaView PDF
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMB/948/2026
Summary: The Rajasthan High Court rejected the bail application of Deepak (age 22) accused under serious charges including IPC sections 121(1), 132, 352, 324(3), 109(1), 3(5) and SC/ST Act provisions. Justice Shubha Mehta found that the petitioner, along with co-accused, allegedly assaulted a police constable with a baseball bat, causing six injuries including a serious head wound on the parietal region. The court held that given the gravity of offenses, the ongoing investigation, medical reports still pending, and the petitioner's prior violation of peace bond conditions, bail was not appropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts